Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal workers have up until February 6 to decide whether to willingly leave their tasks.
The U.S.
Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be allowed to take leave and be paid until the end of September.
Michelle Bercovici is a work attorney who represents federal workers as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her interpretation about what OPM’s postponed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really don’t consider it so much a deal. I think it’s a request to resign with a vague guarantee that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for up to 8 months – but no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have actually been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is since there seems to be the offer of administrative leave for up to eight months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I think that’s an extremely deceptive term to utilize in this situation. When you consider a buyout, there’s usually some sort of composed contract or a concrete deal to offer an advantage in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If clients ask you for your advice, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we inform them is workout severe caution. There are no assurances included in this email. The only thing I can inform you for particular is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially offering up control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some category of staff member who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is somebody like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement need to be the most mindful since leaving earlier than meant can have serious repercussions, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a good offer for individuals who don’t wish to go back to the workplace. Let me just play it.( OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal employees that they have to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and this administration is really generously providing to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a method, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work truly tough to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of individuals’s eyes due to the fact that there are no guarantees. And these are individuals who love their job. They enjoy the objective of the company. They work hard. And today, they’re facing extremely difficult choices, specifically if they’re remote. I suggest, job it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and has been told to report to D.C. otherwise we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal difficulties just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This deal, to be truthful, is so extraordinary that I believe a lot of us are still attempting to determine what to do with it. I’m uncertain if the offer itself may be challengeable. I think the bigger question is the execution of these terms. I’m not conscious of any authority that exists right now for OPM to order agencies to give this number of people administrative leave. So I believe it is quite perhaps setting the phase for obstacles due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually vastly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: job Thank you a lot for having me here.
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights booked. Visit our website terms of usage and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for additional info.
NPR transcripts are produced on a rush due date by an NPR professional. This text may not remain in its final form and job may be upgraded or modified in the future. Accuracy and schedule might differ.
The reliable record of NPR’s programming is the audio record.
