Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have up until February 6 to choose whether to voluntarily leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be enabled to take leave and referall.us be paid till the end of September. Michelle Bercovici is a work attorney who represents federal workers as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s delayed resignation program would really mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I actually do not consider it a lot a deal. I believe it’s a request to resign with a vague promise that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have been utilizing the term buyout to describe what this is because there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for up to 8 months if you take this offer. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would absolutely not explain it as a buyout. I think that’s a really deceptive term to utilize in this situation. When you consider a buyout, there’s usually some sort of written arrangement or a concrete deal to offer a benefit in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your suggestions, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is exercise severe care. There are no guarantees contained in this e-mail. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you change your mind, the company’s most likely not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some category of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that may this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most cautious since leaving earlier than meant can have serious effects, possibly, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed press reporters that this is a bargain for people who don’t wish to go back to the workplace. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal workers that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is really generously providing to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It simply – in a way, it breaks my heart that federal staff members are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it’s created to get folks who work actually tough to resign. I think it’s attempting to pull the wool over a great deal of people’s eyes since there are no assurances. And these are individuals who love their job. They like the mission of the agency. They work hard. And right now, they’re dealing with very hard choices, particularly if they’re remote. I imply, it’s very coercive.MARTIN: You state it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re someone who resides in Oregon and has been to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, somalibidders.com they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you prepare for legal challenges just to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be sincere, is so unmatched that I think a lot of us are still trying to determine what to do with it. I’m not exactly sure if the offer itself might be challengeable. I believe the bigger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not familiar with any authority that exists today for OPM to purchase firms to give this variety of people administrative leave. So I believe it is really much possibly setting the phase for obstacles since I feel OPM has actually vastly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you so much for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our site terms of usage and approvals pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR records are produced on a rush deadline by an NPR specialist. This text might not remain in its final type and might be upgraded or revised in the future. Accuracy and schedule might vary. The reliable record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.